Scientific paper entitled A Directive Ruling in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Abstract
The research was entitled (Arbitration Ruling in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia), which was divided into four sections, namely (what is the judgment of the arbitration, procedures for the issuance of arbitration, types of arbitration referee, the effects of arbitration ruling) and the comparison of them while supporting this by the judicial rulings that the researcher obtains.
The researcher pursued the comparative curriculum in order to compare the Saudi arbitration system with the Egyptian arbitration law, which came different with regard to some procedures, and therefore the study will compare the provisions of the arbitration system in light of the Egyptian arbitration law in order to reach the proper results to address the problem.
The researcher has reached several important results, the most prominent of which is: the Saudi and Egyptian systems excelled in flexibility in determining the language of depositing the arbitration rule, as well as the place of the deposited ruling, as well as the Saudi organizer is distinguished by solving the problem of the lack of a majority of the issuance of the arbitration judgment, by resorting to the competent court to appoint a weighted arbitrator, and finally the need to impose the imposition Attach a copy of the arbitration agreement as part of the arbitration ruling in the Saudi arbitration system.
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.